Controversy has followed the unveiling
of the respectable Time’s cover for the May issue of the magazine.
The cover depicts 26-year-old Jamie Lynne Grumet breastfeeding her
three-year-old son. The story is on “attachment parenting” which Time claims has been a growing parenting
style that has been on the rise for the past 20 years. Many have criticized the
cover saying that it is too risqué and something personal that should not be
publicized. Other critics point out the long term repercussions the cover could
have on the boy’s life. It has sparked discussion on proper parenting
techniques across all media outlets.
In this article the writer examines
the fallout that the controversial cover of Time
is having on social media. Everyone from celebrities to bloggers is up in arms
making comments either defending or condemning the photo. The article also
discusses the photographer’s thoughts and reasons behind taking the picture.
This outlet is interesting because it posts specific “tweets” from several
individuals. A nice mix of professionalism and free-thought.
Television
News Cast: Time
takes a look at attachment parenting and its father
This clip is from the MSNBC morning
show Morning Joe where the hosts
interview Time Magazines managing editor Rick Stengel about their new cover.
They ask questions that might be more typical of an average American mom and
debate the real question the magazine is asking. This outlet is insightful
because it allows someone from the inside a chance to actively defend and
explain this bizarre photo instead of static words on a page.
This blog entry divulges more about the
women on the cover (Jamie Lynne Grumet) and the reaction from certain
right-wing parties. Grumet currently runs the blog I Am Not A Babysitter and is an advocate of attachment parenting. Dan
Gainor of the Culture and Media Institute revealed his feelings by stating "Since
TIME magazine has declined in both circulation and notoriety, it now tries to
be offensive to get attention,”.
On Time’s Facebook page, discussion has erupted. You can really see
the split in the community through their debates (almost exclusively by women).
At the time of this posting there are approximately 350 different comments
concerning this topic. Instead of just filtered news posts or television
scripts you can see the uncensored thoughts of many average people. Many people
are very spirited in their discussion posting comments hundreds of words in
length. Others post a simply “yah or nah” to express their thoughts. Either way
we see a very interesting and pure discussion about a controversial topic.
I have heard nothing but this cover story for weeks. Great story choice. Maybe for your last post follow the story you choose for a longer period of times that you can update the story as it changes.
ReplyDelete